por Herbert Mujica Rojas
Hay sectas cuyo accionar provoca un profundo daño en la sociedad, lo cual aún no ha sido materia del estudio imprescindible de quienes se jactan de “analistas” y “exégetas” de la realidad social. Por el flagrante desconocimiento del problema sectario en el Perú tenemos la obligación de promover el abordaje de esta problemática entre los periodistas, sociólogos, antropólogos, médicos, psiquiatras, psicólogos, abogados y demás profesionales involucrados y comprometidos con el desarrollo democrático del país y dispuestos a condenar cualquier acto que viole los derechos humanos de toda persona y, en especial, su derecho a la libertad de consciencia.
Este trabajo, producto de múltiples horas de trabajo en Lima, Arequipa y otras partes del país y Latinoamérica pretende cumplir un papel pedagógico al denunciar al Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, grupo fascista por convicción y temperamento, y su cancerosa acción al interior de la sociedad peruana. Puédese discrepar de él, de pronto suscita opiniones violentamente contrarias, pero lo que sí va a ser imposible es ignorarlo.
Pocos meses atrás en El totalitarismo católico en el Perú, tesis que en su edición príncipe incluyó menciones a las baladronadas que acostumbra impulsar el Sodalitium, denunciamos cómo, a partir del Concordato, vínculo internacional no sancionado por ningún Congreso, la Iglesia Católica vive a expensas del no pago de tributos y además de los miles de dólares que sus principales funcionarios se embolsican cada mes, sin trabajar, sin merecerlo y en una constante expoliación del pueblo peruano, que no tiene cuando terminar porque se hace en nombre de una “fe” tradicional y que en realidad ha constituido la continuación de un robo que ya supera los 500 años de permanencia insolente en el país. Este mismo Concordato es el que, amparando a la Iglesia Católica, favorece legalmente el expansionismo sodálite y es el que utiliza esta secta para proteger sus inversiones.
Lea pues, amigo lector, estas procelosas páginas con ojos críticos, compulse fuentes, acuda a testimonios, revise materiales, proponga una refutación científica, orgánica. A una idea se la combate con otra. Al sectarismo difundido por el Sodalitium le denunciamos en la comisión de múltiples actividades que son fácilmente comprobables en diarios y publicaciones. A las sectas hay que enfrentarlas con decisión y valentía indómitas. El fanático sabe que cuando tiene a adversarios de ese jaez sólo tiene una opción: luchar o morir. Y puedo anunciar, sin jactancia, pero premunido de la verdad verdadera, que habemos muchos dispuestos a erradicar la presencia de estos disociadores y su prédica retrógrada, exaltadora de principios antidemocráticos y profundamente racistas.
AméricaTV, Cuarto Poder: Sodalicio, surgen más denuncias de ex-integrantes por abuso sexual (vídeos)
- Vídeo 2:
¿Cuál es el destino judicial y eclesiástico de estas denuncias y del mismo Luis Fernando Figari, hoy de retiro espiritual en Roma?
“En el año 1991 previamente a ingresar a la comunidad, Luis Fernando Figari se aparece una madrugada y nos dice quítense la ropa y quédense en calzoncillos y recuerdo a alguien filmándonos, como en este momento”, reveló a Cuarto Poder el exsodalite Oscar Osterling.
Una cadena de abusos psicológicos, físicos y hasta sexuales que se inician con técnicas de manipulación en la que un adolescente pierde su identidad, el derecho a tener ideas propias, reprimir su sexualidad y practicar la obediencia absoluta hacia su líder en nombre de Dios.
Oscar Osterling formó parte del Sodalicio durante dos décadas. Entregó los mejores años de su vida al servicio de esa congregación católica ultraconservadora.
Pero el 2011 decidió salirse de ella cansado de los maltratos psicológicos a los que fue sometido en los últimos cuatros años. El Sodalicio lo castigó y lo envío a Colombia contra su voluntad, por una falta que ellos consideraron muy grave: haberse enamorado de una chica.
“No llego a nada sencillamente había una amistad. A mí me marcó muchísimo. Fue un abuso de autoridad, querían que a través de los test proyectivos apareciera algo. Ellos me decían tú vas a hacer los que diga Luis Fernando”, indicó.
Años después, Osterling denunció estos hechos ante el Tribunal Eclesiástico y se entrevistó con su presidente, el sacerdote Víctor Huapaya.
“Fui a hablar con el padre Huapaya y me dice que no han avanzado nada. Yo ya envíe las denuncias a Roma hace tiempo y me dice que cree que hay alguien en Roma del Sodalicio atajando las denuncias, se refería al Procurador”, recordó.
También denunció prácticas ilegales del Sodalicio, como la vulneración del secreto de sus comunicaciones. En el libro de Pedro Salinas también se hace referencia a la intervención de la correspondencia de los que vivían en comunidad.
Pero de acuerdo a los testimonios brindados por exsodálites, Luis Fernando Figari no sería el único que habría practicado la pederastia al interior de esa organización.
El ya fallecido German Doig, el llamado vicario del Sodalicio y quien fuera en su momento el número dos de esa comunidad, también fue acusado de violación por tres de sus víctimas y esto provocó que su trámite de beatificación iniciado en Roma se paralice.
También otros dos sodálites consagrados muy allegados a Luis Fernando Figari fueron acusados por el mismo delito: violación. Daniel Beltrán Murguía Ward y Jeffrey Daniels.
Padres protestan en colegio de Buenos Aires
lunes, 13 de diciembre de 2010
WIKILEAKS: Docs. confidenciales sobre el Vaticano
CORTESÍA DE PEDRO FLECHA
22 April 2009, 16:27
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000059 EO 12958 DECL: 4/22/2029 TAGS PREL, PGOV, KIRF, VT, CU, VE, BL SUBJECT: (C) VATICAN HOPES FOR BETTER U.S.-CUBA TIES, IN PART TO REIN IN CHAVEZ AND HIS ACOLYTESREF: A. A) CARACAS 486 B. B) CARACAS 443 C. C) VATICAN 36 D. D) VATICAN 12CLASSIFIED BY: Julieta Valls Noyes, CDA, EXEC, State. REASON: 1.4 (b), (d)
1. (C) Summary: The Holy See welcomes President Obama's new outreach to Cuba and hopes for further steps soon, perhaps to include prison visits for the wives of the Cuban Five. Better U.S.-Cuba ties would deprive Hugo Chavez of one of his favorite screeds and could help restrain him in the region, according to a Vatican official. This is highly desirable for the Vatican, which is very concerned about the deterioration of Church-state relations in Venezuela. To avoid similar downward spirals elsewhere, the Vatican said Church leaders elsewhere in Latin America are reaching out to leftist governments. The recent attack on a Cardinal's home in Bolivia may have been intended to derail such quiet rapprochement. End Summary.
Cuba: Great News. What Will You Do Next?
2. (C) CDA and Acting DCM on April 22 called on the Holy See's official in charge of relations with Caribbean and Andean countries, Msgr. Angelo Accattino, to review recent developments in the region. As he had done previously (ref c), Accattino warmly welcomed recent White House policy decisions on Cuba and reviewed with interest the White House Fact Sheet on "Reaching Out to the Cuban People" which CDA gave him. Accattino also noted favorably Raul Castro's comments that Cuba was prepared to talk to the U.S. about all topics - although "after all, he has no other options anymore." CDA said Castro would need to reciprocate the moves from Washington with more than words - he needed to take action on political prisoners or reduce the cost of receiving remittances in Cuba.
3. (C) Accattino said the Vatican considered intriguing the possibility of a swap of political prisoners in Cuba for the "Cuban Five" in jail in the U.S. ADCM protested that their circumstances were not parallel, as the Cuban Five were convicted spies and the prisoners in Cuba were dissidents. Accattino quickly agreed but said discussions that led to the release of the dissidents were worth pursuing regardless. The Holy See was also following the Supreme Court appeal by the Cuban Five, to see how that might affect relations between the U.S. and Cuba. As an interim measure, Accattino suggested that the U.S. allow a jail visit by the wives of two of the five Cuban spies. CDA again noted that the U.S. had taken the first step, now the Cuban government needed to reciprocate in a concrete way.
Venezuela: Chavez is Worried. So is the Church.
4. (C) The Cuba debate, Accattino said, had cast a long shadow at the recent Summit of the Americas. Venezuela's Hugo Chavez was clearly rattled by the thought that the U.S. and Cuba could enter into a dialogue that excluded him, and this motivated his "little scene" at the Summit. "Chavez is not dumb," and he was playing to the other hemispheric leaders with his bombastic approach to President Obama. The Holy See believes that the U.S. and Cuba should pursue a dialogue both for its own sake and/and in order to reduce the influence of Chavez and break up his cabal in Latin America, Accattino said.
5. (C) The situation for civil society in Venezuela is getting worse every day, according to Accattino. The asylum request by Maracaibo Mayor Manuel Rosales in Peru was only the latest sign of the narrowing political space in Venezuela. (Asked for updates on the whereabouts or situation of the Venezuelan asylum seeker Nixon Moreno from the Nunciature in Caracas, however, Accattino answered a bit evasively.) The real concern, Accattino said, is that Venezuela is turning into Cuba, while Cuba may be ready to open up.
6. (C) Church-state relations are also deteriorating daily in Venezuela, Accattino said. The Venezuelan Catholic Conference of Bishops (CEV) did not check in with Rome before taking actions or making statements like its highly critical April 6 communique (ref A). The Holy See agreed with the CEV conclusions, and would defend them -- even when it believed "a less confrontational approach would be more effective."
Bolivia: No More Venezuelas, Let's Talk. But Who Attacked Our Cardinal?
7. (C) Turning to the recent dynamite attack against the residence of Cardinal Terrazas on April 15 in Bolivia, Accattino said it had worried the Holy See greatly. There was property damage, but thankfully no-one was hurt. It could easily have been worse. The Vatican is reserving judgment, pending the government's investigation, on who was behind the attack. It could have been radicals inside the government who want to derail the recent rapprochement between the Church and the state. The extreme right also could have been responsible - trying to make it seem like the government did it - for the same reason. Accattino said the Holy See considers either explanation equally plausible at this point. Meanwhile, it will keep talking to the government, because it has no choice.
Comment: Looking Out for the Church First
8. (C) The Holy See has consistently maintained that improving U.S.-Cuba ties would greatly reduce the appeal of Hugo Chavez. It is so alarmed by the continued downward spiral in its own relations with Chavez, in fact, that Accattino said Church leaders in Latin American countries with leftist governments are rethinking their approach. Many episcopal (bishops) conferences in the region had in the past been willing to criticize excesses of these governments in an effort to protect civil society. They may be pulling back from that activism and advocacy in the short term, in order to protect their longer-term ability to minister to the Catholic faithful without interference. That attitude is what is behind the Church's moves to improve relations with the Morales government in Bolivia. It may also explain Accattino's ever-so-mild tone of criticism when discussing CEV decisions in Caracas. As for Accattino's polite unwillingness to discuss the Nixon Moreno case, that may also be telling, given his considerable interest in the topic last time we spoke (ref c). End Comment.
Lista : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/us-embassy-cables-the-documents
Friday, 20 February 2009, 16:00
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000028 EO 12958 DECL: 2/20/2029 TAGS PREL, ECPS, PHUM, PGOV, KPAO, KIRF, VT SUBJECT: THE HOLY SEE: A FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE REF: VATICAN 25 AND PREVIOUS (NOTAL)
CLASSIFIED BY: Julieta Valls Noyes, CDA, EXEC, State. REASON: 1.4 (b)
The Holy See's communications operation is suffering from 'muddled messaging' partly as a result of cardinals' technophobia and ignorance about 21st century communications. Only one key papal adviser has a Blackberry and few have e-mail accounts. It has led to PR blunders on issues as sensitive as the Holocaust. Key passage highlighted in yellow.
1. (C) Summary: Together with other flaps, the recent global controversy over the lifted excommunication of a Holocaust denying bishop (reftel) exposed a major disconnect between Pope Benedict XVI's stated intentions and the way in which his message is received by the wider world. There are many causes for this communication gap: the challenge of governing a hierarchical yet decentralized organization, leadership weaknesses at the top, and an undervaluing of (and ignorance about) 21st century communications. These factors have led to muddled, reactive messaging that reduces the volume of the moral megaphone the Vatican uses to advance its objectives. This is especially true with audiences whose view of the Vatican is informed largely by mass media coverage. There are signs that at least some in the Vatican have learned their lessons and will work to reshape the Holy See's communications structure. Whether they'll prevail remains to be seen. End Summary.
A CENTRALIZED HIERARCHY MAKING DECENTRALIZED DECISIONS
2. (SBU) The Vatican is highly hierarchical with the Pope ultimately responsible for all important matters. Yet it is also highly decentralized in its decision-making. This structure reflects belief in the principle of "subsidiarity": leaving decisions to those closest to, and best informed on, a particular matter. On a practical level, however, subsidiarity can limit horizontal communication by eliminating peer consultation and review. This approach also encourages a narrow focus on issues at the expense of the big picture.
3. (C) In discussing the recent crisis with CDA and PAO, Archbishop Claudio Celli, President of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, described the Church's current communication style as being focused on the content of a decision, rather than its public impact. Monsignor Paul Tighe, his second in command, noted that this phenomenon is compounded by the fact that officials from the various Church organs see themselves as advocates for their issues, without considering their impact on the Church as a whole. The result is a process in which only a handful of experts are aware of imminent decisions -- even major decisions with broad implications -- and those who are become proponents, rather than impartial advisors to the Pope.
4. (C) A series of missteps during Benedict's Papacy have made the lack of information-sharing in the Church painfully clear. In 2006, the Pope made a speech in Regensburg that was widely decried as insulting to Muslims, though he later explained he had no such intent. In 2008, the Pope himself baptized (i.e., converted)a prominent Muslim during the 2008 Easter Vigil service at St. Peters, an event broadcast worldwide; the Cardinal who runs Inter-Faith Dialogues for the Church knew nothing about the conversion until it happened. This year, Father Federico Lombardi, head of the Vatican press office, and Cardinal Walter Kasper, President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, which includes relations with Jews, learned only after the fact about the decision to reinstate communion with schismatic Lefebrvist bishops who included a Holocaust denier (reftel). In the midst of that scandal, meanwhile, the Pope proposed promoting to auxiliary bishop a priest who said Hurricane Katrina was "divine retribution" for licentiousness in New Orleans. The resulting outcry led the cleric to decline the offer.
A TIN EAR AT THE TOP
5. (C) These public missteps have intensified scrutiny of the small group of decision-makers advising the Pope. Normally reserved Vatican commentators have directed withering criticism their way. XXXXXXXXXXXX, recently wrote that "curial chaos, confusion, and incompetence" had made clear "how dysfunctional the curia remains in terms of both crisis analysis and crisis management." Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone -- who is tasked with managing the Curia and is its highest ranking official after the Pope -- has been a particular target. XXXXXXXXXXXX said Cardinal Bertone had "distinguished himself by his absence" during the Lefebrvist controversy, and that the curia had become "more disorganized than before" under his leadership. Yet XXXXXXXXXXXX may have understated the problem. At the height of the Lefebrvist scandal, Bertone referred publicly to the offending bishop by the wrong name, then denounced the media for "inventing" a problem where there was none. Other critics note Bertone's lack of diplomatic experience (he speaks only Italian, for example), and a personal style that elevates "pastoral" work -- with frequent foreign travel focusing on the spiritual needs of Catholics around the world -- over foreign policy and management.
6. (C) More broadly, critics point to a lack of generational or geographical diversity in the Pope's inner circle. Most of the top ranks of the Vatican -- all men, generally in their seventies -- do not understand modern media and new information technologies. The blackberry-using Father Lombardi remains an anomaly in a culture in which many officials do not even have official email accounts. XXXXXXXXXXXX laid even greater emphasis on the Italo-centric nature of the Pope's closest advisors. Other than Archbishop James Harvey, an American and head of the Papal household, there is no one from an Anglophone country in the Pope's inner circle. XXXXXXXXXXXX said this meant few had exposure to the American -- or, indeed, global -- rough and tumble of media communications. The Pope's Italian advisors, he said, tend towards old-fashioned, inwardly focused communications written in "coded" language that no-one outside their tight circles can decipher. (The Israeli Ambassador, for example, told CDA that he recently received a Vatican statement that was supposed to contain a positive message for Israel, but it was so veiled he missed it, even when told it was there.)
7. (C) There is also the question of who, if anyone, brings dissenting views to the Pope's attention. As noted, Cardinal Bertone is considered a "yes man," and other Cardinals don't hold much sway with the Pope -- or lack the confidence to bring him bad news. And if bad news rarely filters out, leaks never spring. XXXXXXXXXXXX said that under Pope John Paul II leaks were much more common. While damaging, these leaks did allow time for critics of pending decisions to mobilize and present opposing views to the Pope in time. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Bertone run a much tighter ship, he said, but at the expense of squashing coordination or allow dissenting voices to be heard.
NOT SPIN CITY
8. (C) As has become evident throughout the controversies, much of the Vatican hierarchy greatly undervalues external communication. Structurally, the Pontifical Council for Social Communications and the Vatican Press Office are weak. The former applies the Church's teachings to the field of communications and is not involved in shaping the Pope's message. The latter has the writ, but not the influence.
9. (C) Father Lombardi, the spokesman, is not part of the Pope's inner circle. He has little influence over major decisions, even when he knows about them beforehand. And the poor man is terribly overworked: Lombardi is simultaneously the head of the Vatican Press Office, Vatican Radio (which broadcasts in 45 languages), and the Vatican Television Center, literally moving from one office to the other over the course of the day. It's a grueling schedule on good days, and debilitating during crises. Father Lombardi is the deliverer, rather than a shaper, of the message. In the wake of the Lefebrvist controversy, he openly said that the Vatican press office "didn't control the communication." Without a comprehensive communication strategy in which he plays a central role, he is dependent on individual Church organs and leaders seeking his advice. It's a hit or miss proposition.
10. (C) There is another cost to divorcing decision-making from public spin: the Church's message is often unclear. XXXXXXXXXXXX candidly said that the Holy See rarely considered how best to explain dogmatic, ecclesiastical, moral or other decisions to a broader public. He emphasized that the content of the message should not/not be different -- the Catholic Church would often take positions contrary to public opinion -- but the Church hierarchy needed to think more about how to present positions.
CRACKING THE REAL DA VINCI CODE?
11. (C) The communication culture of the broader Catholic Church is diverse, however, with many Church-affiliated organizations now excelling at communication. One example of a Church organization that is using modern communications strategies to deliver its message, interestingly enough, is Opus Dei. (Pope John Paul II was widely perceived as being more adept at public communications than Benedict; his communications director, Joaquin Navarro Valls, famously belongs to Opus Dei.) CDA and PolOff recently met with Manuel Sanchez, Opus Dei's head of international media relations, and discussed how Opus Dei responded to the "Da Vinci Code" - a novel which pilloried the group. Sanchez said that Opus Dei realized it could respond in one of three ways: (1) ignore the controversy; (2) adopt a 'no prisoners' approach and refute every error; or (3) treat the controversy as a chance to explain Opus Dei to the world. Opus Dei chose the third option, holding regular briefings for journalists and others, and the organization's membership has actually increased as a result.
FIXING WHAT'S LOST IN TRANSLATION
12. (C) There is a growing urgency within the Vatican about the need to change the current communication culture. The rare public criticisms offered by Father Lombardi and Cardinal Kasper of their colleagues' roles in the Lefebrvist scandal are an extremely strong indicator of internal disquiet. There are a number of proposals circulating to help fix the problem. XXXXXXXXXXXX have confirmed privately to the Embassy that discussions are underway about having the Pontifical Council for Social Communications assume a greater coordinating role on major decisions. Father Lombardi has privately proposed to his leadership the possibility of creating an office in the Secretariat of State to flag potentially controversial decisions and has asked for resources to prepare translations of major statements more quickly. Other Vatican insiders close to the Pope have suggested bringing more native English speakers into positions in the Pope's inner circle. And not a few voices are calling for Cardinal Bertone's removal from his current position.
13. (C) Behind closed doors, our Vatican contacts seems to be talking about nothing but the need for better internal coordination on decisions and planned public messages. Most Church leaders recoil at the notion that they could be seen as anti-Semitic or endorsing Holocaust denials, yet are confronting the ugly reality that many people actually believe these notions because of their own poor communications culture. But if or when change will come remains an open question. The structural and cultural roots of the current situation are deep, and will not be easily uprooted as they are closely connected to Pope Benedict's governing style. Similar criticism after the disastrous Regensburg speech led to little or no change. The percolating discussions regarding the creation of a policy coordinating body within the curia - and other possible solutions -- are hopeful signs. But they are not yet guarantees that change is coming. Stay tuned. End Comment.
Han perdido la decencia... ha ganado la igualdad: Estado Laico kaput
el proyecto de ley de igualdad religiosa aprobado ayer
en el Congreso han perdido la dignidad y la decencia
y se declaran enemigos de un Estado Laico para el Perú
A los interesados en un Estado Laico:
Pretendíamos que el Estado Laico promoviese la separación irrestricta de iglesias y Estado, que fuese un modo civilizado de convivencia entre los creyentes de diversos credos entre sí y entre los creyentes y no-creyentes. Pensábamos que el pretendido Estado Laico iba a ser la culminacion de un esfuerzo ético por la neutralidad, el respeto y la tolerancia mutua.
Sin embargo es evidente que el totalitarismo de las sectas religiosas se está imponiendo arteramente sobre el anhelo de construir un Estado racional, moderno y democrático para todos. El Estado que vendrá ahora será un Estado donde el avasallamiento de la libertad de conciencia mediante la persuasión coercitiva en la educación pública estará validado por el concepto torcido de "libertad religiosa". La "libertad religiosa", como dijo un visionario, es la libertad de los ignorantes, es la necesidad de mantenerse en el oscurantismo disfrazando la ignorancia cual si fuese un "derecho humano".
Estamos al filo de permitir que nuestra patria se convierta en el paraíso de las sectas donde cualquier grupo religioso, ahora con condición de ente jurídico público, tenga la prerrogativa de usufructuar de nuestos impuestos y del patrimonio nacional, para el enriquecimiento particular de sus líderes.
Ahora quieren que veamos impasibles cómo se estabecen concordatos ya no solamente con la iglesia católica sino con cuanto grupete oscurantista y medieval quiera succionar de la mamadera del Estado Peruano. A diferencia del costoso avance de la laicidad logrado en varios países de la comunidad europea en el Perú vamos caminando raudamente al medioevo mediante el financiamiento y la subvención de las irracionalidades que promueve este proyecto de ley.
Ahora quieren que los bienes mal obtenidos sean "inembargables". En otras palabras, quieren la impunidad cuando sean acusados por cualquier delito que pudiesen cometer. La bancarrota de la iglesia católica estadounidense por los cargos de pederastia clerical no hubiese sido posible si sus bienes hubiesen sido declarados previamente "inembargables".
Ahora ya tampoco quieren pagar impuestos a la renta, alcabala, predial ni propiedad vehicular. Ahora ya no quieren bailar con su propio pañuelo. Ahora también quieren ser las sanguijuelas religiosas del Estado Peruano. Bonito ejemplo el de la iglesia católica.
Está en nuestras manos el elevar nuestra enérgica protesta y utilizar todos los foros de discusión posibles para lograr una conciencia corporativa e intentar evitar un retroceso monumental de nuestra sociedad a estadíos primitivos de religiosidad, irracionalidad y fundamentalismo.
Héctor Guillén Tamayo